Update – 21 June 2019: Refugee Resettlement, Move on Period, Serco Lock Changes, Healthcare Charging & More

Asylum Matters shares periodic updates with our network covering policy developments, campaigning opportunities and general information of interest to refugee and asylum advocates. We’ll now be sharing these updates on our website as well.

Here are a few updates from June 2019, including:

1.       Home Office Announces New Refugee Resettlement Commitment

2.       NACCOM Report: Mind the Gap – One Year On

3.       Refugee Action Report: Turning Words into Actions

4.       Serco Lock Changes in Glasgow

5.       Healthcare Charging Review: Department of Health & Social Care Refusal to Publish Evidence

6.       Chief Inspector of Borders: Call for Evidence of Family Reunion

 

1.       Home Office Announces New Refugee Resettlement Commitment

At the start of the week the Government announced a new commitment to support resettled refugees with existing schemes like the Vulnerable Persons’ Resettlement Scheme, Vulnerable Children’s Resettlement Scheme and Gateway Protection Programme coming to an end during 2020. In a statement, the Home Secretary said, “Once we have delivered our current commitments we will consolidate our biggest resettlement schemes into a new global resettlement scheme. Our priority will be to continue to identify and resettle the most vulnerable refugees, identified and referred by UNHCR. Under the global resettlement scheme, we will broaden our geographical focus beyond the Middle East and North Africa region and be better placed to swiftly respond to international crises in coordination with global partners. In the first year of operation of the new scheme, the UK will aim to resettle in the region of 5000 of the world’s most vulnerable refugees.”  Refugee Council responded to the news, “We fully endorse the move towards consolidating the existing schemes into a single programme. This will help to ensure the UK resettlement programme is more responsive to changes in global conflict situations and resettlement needs.”

2.       NACCOM Report: Mind the Gap – One Year On

NACCOM has launched its Mind the Gap – One Year On report, which builds on findings published in June 2018 that made a direct link between Home Office policy and the high prevalence of homelessness among refugees in the UK. Details from the follow-up report, which contains new evidence gathered from winter night shelters in Manchester, London and Leicester, have been published in an exclusive article in the Independent online.  Key data shows that 36% of refugees using the night shelter services were known to have left their asylum accommodation in the previous six months. This is a higher proportion than in 2018, when 21% of the refugee guests were known to have left asylum accommodation in the previous six months. In addition, the number of refugees known to have left asylum accommodation within the previous 1-4 weeks has risen proportionally. The report recommends that the move-on period is extended to 56 days, as well as an extension of support for asylum seekers and an increase in integration loans to reflect the cost of entering the private rental market. The Home Office replied, “If an asylum seeker is granted refugee status or humanitarian protection they have immediate and unrestricted access to the labour market and many mainstream benefits.”

3.       Refugee Action Report: Turning Words into Actions

Refugee Action has released a new report called ‘Turning Words into Action’ which highlights the stark contrast between the Government’s rhetoric on supporting everyone in the country, including refugees, to learn English, and the lack of concrete action and new funding needed to achieve this goal. It reveals that funding for providers of English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) classes across England has shrunk dramatically over the past decade, from £212.3m in 2008 to £105m in 2018 – a real terms cut of almost 60%. This means refugees have long waits to access classes, don’t receive adequate hours to learn properly and the lack of childcare provision means parents are often unable to take part in classes at all. Refugee Action is calling on the Government to create a fund to allow all refugees to receive a minimum eight hours a week of formal, accredited English language teaching for their first two years in the UK, starting from within a month of their arrival in the country or from being granted status. The report can be found here and you can share on social media with #LetRefugeesLearn.

4.       Serco Lock Changes in Glasgow

Serco, the current asylum accommodation provider in Glasgow, has announced that it will restart a lock-change programme in which hundreds of asylum seekers will be removed from their homes. Serco first announced that it was issuing eviction notices to tenants who had been denied the right to remain in the UK last July. This was paused after a legal challenge was mounted against Serco arguing that evictions would be unlawful without a court order. This was dismissed by a judge in April, though the Govan Law Centre is supporting an appeal of the decision and has called for the evictions to be suspended in the meantime. Serco claims it costs about £1m a year to support people who remain in their properties after having their asylum claims rejected. It will no longer be providing accommodation in Glasgow from September after it lost the contract to Mears, though will continue to deliver accommodation in other regions, despite having been fined nearly £7 million for previous failings (the Guardian report on this is here). The Scottish Refugee Council noted, “Serco have announced their intention to make thirty people a week street homeless. The consequences of these evictions are clear: extreme human suffering on a mass scale with all the immediate adverse health and exploitation risks that ensue.” Aileen Campbell, the Communities Secretary, commented, “The Home Office has to live up to its responsibilities. It is not acceptable to leave the asylum accommodation provider to deal with the inevitable results of a flawed system, and to wash your hands of the consequences.”

5.       Healthcare Charging Review: Department of Health & Social Care Refusal to Publish Evidence

The Department of Health & Social Care has refused to share any of the evidence from their review into the impact of the NHS Visitor Charging Regulations from 2017 with the Health & Social Care Committee. The exchange between the Committee Chair, Dr Sarah Wollaston MP, and Health Secretary, Matt Hancock MP is available here. Despite reassurances from the Committee that the evidence would not be made public, the Health Secretary claims that their refusal to share the evidence is due to the importance of “maintaining the confidentiality of the evidence” submitted to the Department. The Committee considers this refusal to be contrary to the Government’s commitment to being “as open and transparent as possible” with select committees, and to the presumption that requests for information from Select Committees will be agreed to, as recorded in paragraph 40 of the Government’s guidance for civil servants on giving evidence to select committees. It has consequently invited the Secretary of State to give evidence in person on Tuesday 25 June, to account for the refusal to provide the information. More information can be found here.

6.       Chief Inspector of Borders: Call for Evidence of Family Reunion

The Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration (ICIBI) invites anyone with knowledge and experience of the Home Office’s handling of family reunion applications to submit evidence for his next inspection. The inspection will look to address whether the Home Office family reunion policy and guidance, including eligibility criteria, are clear, accessible and relevant to the circumstances of those looking to be reunited, applied consistently and with understanding and compassion.  All bodies with relevant knowledge and expertise, including NGOs, academics, think tanks, faith groups and representative bodies, are invited to submit evidence or case studies by 24 June 2019. Individuals, including those who have first-hand experience of the family reunion application process, are also encouraged to submit evidence. More details of the investigation can be found here.

Scroll to top