- Advocacy and campaigning Initiatives
#FightTheAntiRefugeeLaws
Urging the Home Secretary to resume processing Syrian asylum claims
Last week Asylum Matters co-ordinated a joint public letter to the Home Secretary, opposing the Government’s ‘dehumanising’ decision to suspend Syrian asylum claims following the fall of the Assad regime. Key asks of the letter included resuming the processing of Syrian asylum claims, lifting the ban on the right to work for Syrians and all people seeking asylum after 6 months, and the ruling out of any forced returns or coercive repatriations.
The letter was signed by over 730 organisations and individuals who support people seeking asylum, and was covered in The Independent, The Guardian and the Evening Standard. Thank you to all who signed and shared this letter amongst their networks. Not only was the refugee and asylum sector united in condemning this policy, individuals from all walks of life representing a cross-section of society proud to welcome refugees signed on, including doctors, nurses, midwives, solicitors, legal advisors, consultants, retirees, students, volunteers, refugees, campaigners, professors, lecturers, teachers, and researchers.
We are developing further resources partners can use to ramp up the pressure on the Home Secretary and fight to get this decision overturned. What we know from our years of campaigning to fight the anti-refugee laws is that this isn’t an isolated issue. Stripping an entire nationality group of the opportunity to be granted protection is an attack on the universal right to seek asylum – an attack we can’t ignore.
Right now, the Government is working on its new asylum bill, so it’s bound to be watching public reaction to moves like this. By standing up for the rights of Syrian people seeking asylum, we can show the public is ready to fight for all asylum rights, so they know that any legislation that doesn’t protect and support people seeking sanctuary won’t be accepted by the public.
TAKE ACTION:
Lift the Ban
A new report by the Institute for Government has recommended lifting the ban on the right to work, adding to the growing weight of evidence that lifting the ban is a common sense policy the Government must adopt. Meanwhile, Members of the Scottish Parliament have been maintaining their calls for the right to work during Scottish Parliamentary debates, while the Evening Standard has been running a powerful campaign echoing this call during their Winter Appeal in articles here and here.
Accommodation
Communities Not Camps
We are still awaiting the judgement of the ongoing legal challenge over people being warehoused at the RAF Wethersfield camp. Despite the Government no longer using the Bibby Stockholm barge and not proceeding with establishing a new camp at RAF Scampton, camps at barrack sites in Wethersfield and Napier remain open – so we campaign on for people to be housed in #CommunitiesNotCamps. Take action and write to your MP and urge them to #CloseTheCamps with a couple of clicks with our easy letter-writing tool.
Hotels
Elsewhere, Coventry Council is considering legal action against the Government over the use of hotels. A row has broken out between Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham and the UK Government over the responsibility for housing destitute people seeking asylum. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has told Times Radio she has served closure notice on seven asylum hotels. If she can close hotels, she can #CloseTheCamps.
Contracts
Finally, the aforementioned Institute for Government report released today includes calls for people seeking asylum to be housed in communities, not camps, and for the AASC and AIRE asylum accommodation contracts to be repurposed.
Asylum Poverty
Move-on period extended to 56 days
The UK Government has announced its decision to extend the move-on period for newly granted or refused refugees from 28-days to 56-days. Congratulations to organisations like NACCOM who have long championed this policy change.
High Court ruling on NRPF
In November, the High Court ruled that the Home Office’s use of the No Recourse to Public Funds (NPRF) condition is unlawful regarding the Home Office’s system for deciding Change of Conditions applications. The High Court decided that the Home Office’s current system is unlawful, because of long delays which are in breach of their duty to protect human rights. Read a full explainer on Right to Remain blog